From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@linuxpower.ca>
Cc: long <tlnguyen@snoqualmie.dp.intel.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com, grep@kroah.com, jgarzik@pobox.com,
jun.nakajima@intel.com, tom.l.nguyen@intel.com,
tony.luck@intel.com
Subject: Re: RE[PATCH]2.6.4-rc3 MSI Support for IA64
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 23:34:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16466.18720.70066.525158@napali.hpl.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403121743310.29087@montezuma.fsmlabs.com>
>>>>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:26:39 -0500 (EST), Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@linuxpower.ca> said:
Zwane> I wonder if we could consolidate these vector allocators as
Zwane> assign_irq_vector(AUTO_ASSIGN) has the same semantics as
Zwane> ia64_alloc_vector() and the one for i386 is also almost the
Zwane> same as its MSI ilk.
Agreed. I don't see any reason why ia64_alloc_vector() and
assign_irq_vector() couldn't or shouldn't be one and the same thing
(and assign_irq_vector() is a fine name).
Tom, if you want to send me a patch that converts the existing uses of
ia64_alloc_vector() to assign_irq_vector(), I'd be happy to apply
(assuming it's clean etc., as usual).
--david
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-12 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-12 22:38 RE[PATCH]2.6.4-rc3 MSI Support for IA64 long
2004-03-12 23:26 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-03-12 23:34 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2004-03-12 23:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2004-03-13 0:14 ` Nguyen, Tom L
2004-03-13 0:22 ` Nguyen, Tom L
2004-03-13 1:44 ` Nakajima, Jun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16466.18720.70066.525158@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=grep@kroah.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tlnguyen@snoqualmie.dp.intel.com \
--cc=tom.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=zwane@linuxpower.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox