From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: BUG 2.6.7 hangs on boot (rx2600)
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 05:55:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16605.4041.223070.440847@napali.hpl.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040622061505.GA23075@cup.hp.com>
>>>>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 22:48:26 -0700, "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com> said:
Ken> David Mosberger wrote on Friday, June 25, 2004 10:29 PM
Ken> The relocation of r16 is incorrect. For BP, we are not installing any
Ken> region 7 TLB mapping.
>> Indeed! I must be missing something though: with your patch, r13 will
>> be initialized to the region 7 address again, which defeats the
>> purpose of the original patch. I think the initialization of r13
>> needs to be conditional on whether we're dealing with init_task or
>> anything else.
Ken> Not sure what you mean. The first two hunks are trying to revert the
Ken> change in rev 1.24 and r16 initialization, which gets put into kr(stack)
Ken> later. I'm not touching r13.
Ah, yes, my bad (I guess I really should catch up sleep first...).
>> True, but it's really ugly to add more special cases. Wouldn't it be
>> better to explicitly pass the sp/bsp that need to be restored?
>> (Caveat: can't use the normal calling conventions there; perhaps r17
>> and r18 could be used?)
Ken> Yeah, but we have to update all the call sites, current efi_call_phys
Ken> and two other PAL static/stacked calls.
True, but I think there are only 3 call-sites. If it turns out to be
_really_ ugly we can reonsider, but I think it might be a better
choice in the long run.
--david
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-26 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-22 6:15 BUG 2.6.7 hangs on boot (rx2600) Grant Grundler
2004-06-22 13:50 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-06-22 14:51 ` Grant Grundler
2004-06-22 15:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2004-06-22 21:16 ` Grant Grundler
2004-06-22 21:23 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2004-06-22 22:28 ` Grant Grundler
2004-06-22 22:30 ` Grant Grundler
2004-06-22 22:38 ` Arun Sharma
2004-06-23 14:26 ` Tian, Kevin
2004-06-23 17:03 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-06-23 22:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2004-06-24 2:57 ` Tian, Kevin
2004-06-25 0:36 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-06-25 16:31 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-06-26 5:29 ` David Mosberger
2004-06-26 5:48 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-06-26 5:55 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2004-06-29 15:09 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-06-29 15:34 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-06-29 17:32 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-06-29 17:40 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-06-29 17:45 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-06-29 18:03 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-06-29 18:13 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-06-29 18:19 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-06-29 21:19 ` David Mosberger
2004-06-29 23:18 ` David Mosberger
2004-06-30 16:17 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-06-30 18:11 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-06 23:43 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-06 23:45 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-07 16:20 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-07 23:56 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-08 18:13 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-08 18:31 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-07-08 18:39 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-08 18:43 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-08 18:46 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-12 17:59 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16605.4041.223070.440847@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox