From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
george anzinger <george@mvista.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ia64 <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 01:16:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16629.56037.120532.779793@napali.hpl.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1089852486.1388.256.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com>
>>>>> On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:48:06 -0700, john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> said:
John> Although you still have the issue w/ NTP adjustments being
John> ignored, but last time I looked at the time_interpolator code,
John> it seemed it was being ignored there too, so at least your not
John> doing worse then the ia64 do_gettimeofday(). [If I'm doing the
John> time_interpolator code a great injustice with the above,
John> someone please correct me]
The existing time-interpolator code for ia64 never lets time go
backwards (in the absence of a settimeofday(), of course). There is
no need to special-case NTP.
With Christoph's changes, NTP is an issue again, however.
--david
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-15 1:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-14 16:41 gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer Christoph Lameter
2004-07-14 20:09 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the john stultz
2004-07-14 20:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2004-07-14 21:14 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-14 21:15 ` john stultz
2004-07-15 0:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2004-07-15 0:48 ` john stultz
2004-07-15 1:16 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2004-07-15 1:35 ` john stultz
2004-07-15 3:57 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-15 15:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2004-07-15 16:14 ` john stultz
2004-07-15 17:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2004-07-15 17:18 ` john stultz
2004-07-15 22:59 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer George Anzinger
2004-07-16 2:44 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the Christoph Lameter
2004-07-14 21:09 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer functions to return higher Matthew Wilcox
2004-07-14 21:27 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16629.56037.120532.779793@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox