From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Mosberger Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 03:57:56 +0000 Subject: Re: gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the Message-Id: <16630.196.880937.911232@napali.hpl.hp.com> List-Id: References: <1089835776.1388.216.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> <1089839740.1388.230.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> <1089852486.1388.256.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> <16629.56037.120532.779793@napali.hpl.hp.com> <1089855319.1388.295.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1089855319.1388.295.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: john stultz Cc: David Mosberger , Christoph Lameter , george anzinger , lkml , ia64 >>>>> On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 18:35:20 -0700, john stultz said: john> On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 18:16, David Mosberger wrote: >> >>>>> On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:48:06 -0700, john stultz >> said: >> The existing time-interpolator code for ia64 never lets time go >> backwards (in the absence of a settimeofday(), of course). There >> is no need to special-case NTP. John> I guess I don't understand then, from my looking over it I John> didn't see where the time_interpolator_get_offset() is scaled John> back when NTP is slewing the clock. Are you looking at Christoph's code? My explanation applies to the old interpolation-code... --david