public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.9] Avoid a rare deadlock during unwind
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:30:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16759.51231.826151.918195@napali.hpl.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9718.1098174005@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>

>>>>> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:20:05 +1000, Keith Owens <kaos@sgi.com> said:

  Keith> There is a rare deadlock condition during unwind script
  Keith> creation.  If build_script() is interrupted in the middle of
  Keith> creating the script, it holds the script write lock.  If the
  Keith> interrupt handler needs to call unwind for some failure
  Keith> condition, unwind will try to read the incomplete script and
  Keith> will deadlock on the script lock.

  Keith> The fix is to disable interrupts while building the script,
  Keith> so interrupt handlers never see partial scripts.

  Keith> Promoting spin_lock_irqsave() from script_new() to
  Keith> find_save_locs() changes the indentation, so the patch looks
  Keith> bigger than it really is.

I'm not sure this is safe.  You're now acquiring the read/write-lock
after the spinlock and according to the SMP conventions mentionted at
the beginning of the file, this isn't safe:

 *      o if both the unw.lock spinlock and a script's read-write lock must be
 *        acquired, then the read-write lock must be acquired first.

Did you check that this isn't a problem?  If so, it would at least be
necessary to update the comment.

	--david

  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-21 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-19  8:20 [patch 2.6.9] Avoid a rare deadlock during unwind Keith Owens
2004-10-21 14:30 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2004-10-21 14:44 ` Keith Owens
2004-10-22  9:27 ` David Mosberger
2004-10-22 10:10 ` Keith Owens
2004-10-22 10:14 ` Keith Owens
2004-10-22 10:50 ` David Mosberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16759.51231.826151.918195@napali.hpl.hp.com \
    --to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox