From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Mosberger Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:48:19 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] cleanup swiotlb.c a bit Message-Id: <16861.38403.969492.971923@napali.hpl.hp.com> List-Id: References: <200501060945.12364.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <200501060945.12364.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org >>>>> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:42:52 -0800, Jesse Barnes said: >> Well, I don't like how you "fixed" some of them and I continue >> to be of the opinion that 100 cols is OK (yes, I know that >> somebody managed to get the 80 cols into the kernel formatting >> document, but that doesn't change reality...). Jesse> Yeah, I know, but your opinion is wrong :) I often find Jesse> myself editing files on VTs or other 80 col terminals, and Jesse> long lines are a pain... It's not opinion, it's reality. Unless someone goes through all the files in the top-level directories and formats them to 80 cols, this won't change. --david