From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Mosberger Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 20:00:11 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] cleanup swiotlb.c a bit Message-Id: <16861.39115.110083.6350@napali.hpl.hp.com> List-Id: References: <200501060945.12364.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <200501060945.12364.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org >>>>> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:50:56 -0800, Jesse Barnes said: >> It's not opinion, it's reality. Unless someone goes through all >> the files in the top-level directories and formats them to 80 >> cols, this won't change. Jesse> I'd be happy to do that if you're ok with it. Eh, I'm talking about linux/kernel/* etc, so it's really Andrew and Linus who'd have to be OK with it. If you can fix those, I'd be happy to adjust the ia64 files to fit within 80 cols. Jesse> The long lines have always irritated me a little. I think I Jesse> understand why you like them though--with long lines you can Jesse> fit slightly more code on the screen vertically, which can be Jesse> a help, but I don't think they're common enough for that to Jesse> be very compelling... I don't particularly like 100 cols. I'd be happy if all (major) Linux kernel files fit into 80 cols, it's just that in reality, you need 100 cols to look at most important kernel files. --david