From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Mosberger Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 19:40:53 +0000 Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] Kprobes support for IA64 Message-Id: <17046.9797.422792.800821@napali.hpl.hp.com> List-Id: References: <429484F2.8080401@hp.com> <12169.1117068542@ocs3.ocs.com.au> <20050525180652.B10277@unix-os.sc.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20050525180652.B10277@unix-os.sc.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Keshavamurthy Anil S Cc: Keith Owens , "Alan D. Brunelle" , "Lynch, Rusty" , akpm@osdl.org, "Luck, Tony" , "Seth, Rohit" , prasanna@in.ibm.com, ananth@in.ibm.com, systemtap@sources.redhat.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> On Wed, 25 May 2005 18:06:52 -0700, Keshavamurthy Anil S said: Keshavamurthy> I agree with Keith, when a person taking a instructin Keshavamurthy> dump, a different value will help uniquely identify Keshavamurthy> that this is a kprobe break instruction which is a Keshavamurthy> replaced instrucion of the original instruction. So Keshavamurthy> we will leave with what we have now, i.e handle the Keshavamurthy> same with two cases. We could read the imm21 value from the break.b instruction. --david