From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russ Anderson Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:32:01 +0000 Subject: Re: Yet another MCA handler Message-Id: <200401142332.i0ENW26d024056@ben.americas.sgi.com> List-Id: References: <40051D1B.7912DB91@nospam.org> In-Reply-To: <40051D1B.7912DB91@nospam.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Zoltan Menyhart wrote: > > I was to write the code for the recovery for poisoned memory, too, > but I've got no way to provoke this kind of error > ( I do not really know what it like is :-) ) If you get that far, take the Intel Itanium 2 Processor Specification Update (December 2003) errata 78 into account 78. L2 cache line with poison data results in unexpected fatal MCA http://www.intel.com/design/itanium2/specupdt/251141.htm -- Russ Anderson, OS RAS/Partitioning Project Lead SGI - Silicon Graphics Inc rja@sgi.com