From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Grundler Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 17:48:42 +0000 Subject: Re: PCI question Message-Id: <20040204174842.GB25250@cup.hp.com> List-Id: References: <200402032235.i13MZQXl018906@fsgi900.americas.sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <200402032235.i13MZQXl018906@fsgi900.americas.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 11:04:42AM -0600, Patrick Gefre wrote: > I think the 2.4 definition will be fine - at least for now. Was there a > reason it was changed in 2.6 ? Because no one was using it? Pat, two (three?) people have asked you to state what you want to add. Can you state the basic problem additional data fields would solve? It might be easier to just add those fields directly to pci_controller instead of messing with platform_data. grant