From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 12:24:27 +0000 Subject: Re: q-tools-0.0 released Message-Id: <20040206122427.GJ24334@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> List-Id: References: <20040205215009.GA2316@cup.hp.com> In-Reply-To: <20040205215009.GA2316@cup.hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 11:26:47PM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote: > Grant, > > On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 09:05:21PM -0800, Grant Grundler wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 02:57:22PM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote: > > > You need to have libpfm-3.0 installed on your system. > > > I think Al Stone published the package on the Debian sites. > > > You need the development + runtime packages. > > > > Stephane, > > Yes, he did. > > Debian currently has: > > ii libpfm 2.0-6 IA-64 Performance Monitor (PMU) -- runt-time > > ii libpfm-dev 2.0-6 IA-64 Performance Monitor (PMU) -- developme > > ii pfmon 3.0-2 a performance monitoring tool for Linux/ia64 > > > > The pfmon from debian was probably built against "2.0-6" libpfm. > That's wrong. I don't event think it compiles that way. > > > Is that bad? > Yes, it is. there should be a libpfm_3.0 and libpfm-dev_3.0 packages. Looks like the Debian packages have some problems: Package: pfmon Depends: libc6.1 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libelfg0, libpfm2, libpfm3 $ sudo apt-get install pfmon The following packages have unmet dependencies: pfmon: Depends: libpfm2 but it is not installable Depends: libpfm3 but it is not installable Al, what's up? -- "Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain