On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 02:43:14PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 13:37:28 -0500, Martin Hicks said: > > Martin> How about this patch? I just tested it on a 512p machine > Martin> and it booted. > > I suspect a better fix would be to change do_IRQ() such that it > doesn't call note_interrupt() for IRQ_PER_CPU interrupts. For per-CPU > interrupts, the note_interrupt() code is racy and rather bogus anyhow. Okay....Here it is. I didn't test it on a big machine yet, but it certainly seems like it takes care of the problem. mh -- Martin Hicks || mort@bork.org || PGP/GnuPG: 0x4C7F2BEE