From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
Cc: jbarnes@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: per-cpu blk_plug_list
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 05:13:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040302211309.500f43fb.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B05667366EE6204181EABE9C1B1C0EB50211E5C8@scsmsx401.sc.intel.com>
"Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>
> I don't understand the proposal here. There is a per-device lock
> already. But the plugged queue need to be on some list outside itself
> so a group of them can be unplugged later on to flush all the I/O.
here's the proposal:
Regarding this:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0403.0/0179.html
And also having looked at Miquel's (currently slightly defective)
implementation of the any_congested() API for devicemapper:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.4-rc1/2.6.4-rc1-mm1/broken-out/queue-congestion-dm-implementation.patch
I am thinking that an appropriate way of solving the blk_run_queues() lock
contention problem is to nuke the global plug list altogther and make the
unplug function a method in struct backing_device_info.
This is conceptually the appropriate place to put it - it is almost always
the case that when we run blk_run_queues() it is on behalf of an
address_space, and the few remaining case can be simply deleted -
mm/mempool.c is the last one I think.
The implementation of backing_dev_info.unplug() would have to run the
unplug_fn of every queue which contributes to the top-level queue (the
thing which the address_space is sitting on top of).
We discussed this maybe a year ago with Jens but decided against it for
complexity reasons, but gee, dm_table_any_congested() isn't complex. Do we
forsee any particular problem with this?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-03 5:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-03 4:20 per-cpu blk_plug_list Chen, Kenneth W
2004-03-03 5:13 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040302211309.500f43fb.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jbarnes@sgi.com \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox