public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
Cc: jbarnes@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: per-cpu blk_plug_list
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 05:13:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040302211309.500f43fb.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B05667366EE6204181EABE9C1B1C0EB50211E5C8@scsmsx401.sc.intel.com>

"Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>
> I don't understand the proposal here.  There is a per-device lock
> already.  But the plugged queue need to be on some list outside itself
> so a group of them can be unplugged later on to flush all the I/O.


here's the proposal:


Regarding this:

 http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0403.0/0179.html

 And also having looked at Miquel's (currently slightly defective)
 implementation of the any_congested() API for devicemapper:

 ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.4-rc1/2.6.4-rc1-mm1/broken-out/queue-congestion-dm-implementation.patch

 I am thinking that an appropriate way of solving the blk_run_queues() lock
 contention problem is to nuke the global plug list altogther and make the
 unplug function a method in struct backing_device_info.

 This is conceptually the appropriate place to put it - it is almost always
 the case that when we run blk_run_queues() it is on behalf of an
 address_space, and the few remaining case can be simply deleted -
 mm/mempool.c is the last one I think.

 The implementation of backing_dev_info.unplug() would have to run the
 unplug_fn of every queue which contributes to the top-level queue (the
 thing which the address_space is sitting on top of).

 We discussed this maybe a year ago with Jens but decided against it for
 complexity reasons, but gee, dm_table_any_congested() isn't complex.  Do we
 forsee any particular problem with this?

      reply	other threads:[~2004-03-03  5:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-03  4:20 per-cpu blk_plug_list Chen, Kenneth W
2004-03-03  5:13 ` Andrew Morton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040302211309.500f43fb.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jbarnes@sgi.com \
    --cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox