From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bjorn Helgaas Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 16:34:59 +0000 Subject: Re: IA64 test report: .6.4-rc1-mm2/Lion 2004-3-3: 10/10 pass Message-Id: <200403030934.59343.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> List-Id: References: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8401720DBF@PDSMSX403.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8401720DBF@PDSMSX403.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Is this the same box as the 2.6.4-rc1 test? I guess not -- the "Lion 2.6.4-rc1" test claims this: > ACPI: XSDT (v001 INTEL SR870BN4 0x01072002 MSFT 0x00010013) @ 0x00000000= 3ff83090 Which looks like an 870-based box (Tiger, maybe)? This one ("Lion 2.6.4-mm2") looks 460-based: > ACPI: XSDT (v001 INTEL SR460AC 0x00000003 MSFT 0x0100000a) @ 0x00000000= 5fe96658 > 4 CPUs available, 8 CPUs total So 4 of the 8 CPUs are disabled. Is that what you expect? > ACPI: LSAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lsapic_id[0x01] lsapic_eid[0x00] enabled) > CPU 1 (0x0100) enabled > CPU 1: base freq=133.333MHz, ITC ratio=12/2, ITC freq=800.003MHz+/--1ppm > Calibrating delay loop... 797.80 BogoMIPS > CPU 1: synchronized ITC with CPU 0 (last diff 0 cycles, maxerr 551 cycles) Hmm... We still print 5 lines per CPU (tons better than it used to be), but we have no indication of what processor model it is. That seems more useful than some of this stuff. > pci_irq-0302 [03] acpi_pci_irq_derive : Unable to derive IRQ for devic= e 0000:00:03.3 > ACPI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin B of device 0000:00:03.3 Ah, here's our friend the SMBus device. No USB funnies in this boot. I guess that's probably due to the fact that this really isn't the same box as the 2.6.4-rc1 boot.