From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: sched-domains
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:21:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040317132100.106f62e7.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
Folks, I remain all in a dither over the sched-domains NUMA/SMT work which
has been in the -mm kernels for a while.
I have no concerns about its stability, but I do want to see general
agreement that this is the way to proceed, although of course it may need
enhancements/tuning later on.
In terms of performace testing results I believe everything has been
positive except for some testing which Andi did on the STREAM benchmark.
My question is: to what extent have the ia64 NUMA architectural people
reviewed this code, and what is the risk that someone will come along in
six months time saying we need to rip it all out?
Thanks.
next reply other threads:[~2004-03-17 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-17 21:21 Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-03-18 23:35 ` sched-domains John Hawkes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040317132100.106f62e7.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox