On Thursday, April 8, 2004 12:30 am, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Also, I am heartily sick of this gunk from the assembler:
>
> {standard input}:20882: Warning: This is the location of the conflicting
> usage  {standard input}:20917: Warning: Use of 'ld4' may violate RAW
> dependency 'DBR#' (data) {standard input}:20917: Warning: Only the first
> path encountering the conflict is reported {standard input}:20882: Warning:
> This is the location of the conflicting usage {standard input}:20917:
> Warning: Use of 'ld4' may violate RAW dependency 'DBR#' (data)
>
> Has that been fixed yet?  If so, which is a good version of binutils to
> start using?

H.J. said he'd fix it when he had time, I think it involves a rewrite of the 
dependency checking code in binutils.  I ended up compiling binutils with 
this hack to avoid the checks altogether.

Jesse