From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 19:40:17 +0000 Subject: Re: Dynamic System Calls & System Call Hijacking Message-Id: <20040420194016.GF1413@openzaurus.ucw.cz> List-Id: References: <4084E85E.4722BFC6@nospam.org> In-Reply-To: <4084E85E.4722BFC6@nospam.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Zoltan.Menyhart@bull.net Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > - Can't recompile the kernel, otherwise you gonna lose RedHat guarantee ? > Or some ISVs like whose name starts with an "O" and terminates with "racle" > ain't gonna support it ? > + No problem, I'll load your syscall in a module. Well, by forcing syscall in, you loose your guarantee, too. cat /dev/urandom > /dev/kmem "RedHat, help, my machine crashed." > Your remarks will be appreciated. I hope it at least taints the kernel. And you did test on smp kernel, trying to race syscall calling against your module load/unload, right? -- 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq( ttlQ timeD8769.1 ms