From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bill Nottingham Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 19:23:19 +0000 Subject: Re: lib64 in fedora glibc Message-Id: <20040604192319.GF3454@nostromo.devel.redhat.com> List-Id: References: <20040528214105.GK9115@mustard.zk3.dec.com> In-Reply-To: <20040528214105.GK9115@mustard.zk3.dec.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org David Mosberger (davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com) said: > Andreas> I don't know what Red Hat is doing with x86 and with lib64 - and you > Andreas> really should ask them for clarification. > > Certainly. I only wished Red Hat would be more > willing/interested/active in discussing such things on public mailing > lists. Where this came out of was requests from various partners and ISVs who noticed that their 32-bit apps didn't run right on ia64 with the /emul/ia32-linux prefix. This is due to some of the fundamental issues with that arrangement: - 64-bit processes don't see into that tree because of their personality (think: shell scripts) - the results of readdir() on a directory in /emul/ia32-linux will not necessarily match the files you can actually access with open() The simplest way to solve this, while maintaining compatiblity with ia32 packages, is to get them on the same filesystem. This is where the proposal stemmed from, originally. We can always just live with crappy ia32 (and by extension, x86-64) support on ia64. :) Bill