From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:26:15 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] SGI Altix cross partition functionality
Message-Id: <20040622182615.GA7251@infradead.org>
List-Id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20040617183638.GA3712@sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040617183638.GA3712@sgi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 01:17:07PM -0500, Dean Nelson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 08:22:29PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > 
> > +} xpc_vars_t;
> > 
> > please kill all the typedef gunk.
> 
> I'm in the process of ditching all of my typedef's. But before I axed the
> following two I thought I'd ask if an exception should be made in their
> case? Or are all typedef's deemed offlimits without exception?
> 
> 	typedef void (*xpc_channel_func_t)(enum xpc_retval, partid_t, int,
> 						void *, void *);
> 
> 	typedef void (*xpc_notify_func_t)(enum xpc_retval, partid_t, int,
> 						void *);
> 
> (Note: I had nothing to do with the partid_t typedef.)

Thos are okay.  In the kernel we often don't use _t postfixes for those
either, but it doesn't really matter.