From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:36:54 +0000 Subject: Re: Latest Altix I/O code reorganization code Message-Id: <20040827163654.A32236@infradead.org> List-Id: References: <200408042014.i74KE8fD141211@fsgi900.americas.sgi.com> <20040806141836.A9854@infradead.org> <411AAABB.8070707@sgi.com> <412F4EC9.7050003@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <412F4EC9.7050003@sgi.com>; from pfg@sgi.com on Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:10:01AM -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Patrick Gefre Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:10:01AM -0500, Patrick Gefre wrote: > io_init.c iomv.c Makefile pci pci_dma.c pci_extension.c > > arch/ia64/sn/ioif/pci: > Makefile pcibr_ate.c pcibr_dma.c pcibr_provider.c pcibr_reg.c xtalk_providers.c > So why are pci_dma.c and pci_extensions.c not under pci? You probably should just kill that pci subdir, too when there's just two other files left. Or move those two to kernel/ and have a pci/ subdir which seems to fit other ports quite well. But I'd rather see the functional changes first and then do renaming of unchanged files last anyway so you changed get actually reviewable. The current patchkit is not.