From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 21:55:00 +0000 Subject: Re: page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 Message-Id: <20040902145500.271ae676.davem@davemloft.net> List-Id: References: <20040827172337.638275c3.davem@davemloft.net> <20040827173641.5cfb79f6.akpm@osdl.org> <20040828010253.GA50329@muc.de> <20040827183940.33b38bc2.akpm@osdl.org> <16687.59671.869708.795999@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20040827204241.25da512b.akpm@osdl.org> <20040827223954.7d021aac.akpm@osdl.org> <1094012028.6539.320.camel@gaston> <20040902212634.GJ16175@wotan.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20040902212634.GJ16175@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andi Kleen Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, akpm@osdl.org, clameter@sgi.com, paulus@samba.org, ak@muc.de, ak@suse.de, wli@holomorphy.com, davem@redhat.com, raybry@sgi.com, manfred@colorfullife.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vrajesh@umich.edu, hugh@veritas.com On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 23:26:34 +0200 Andi Kleen wrote: > I would do atomic64 on 64bit archs only and then do a wrapper > somewhere that defines atomiclongt based on BITSPERLONG We do have CONFIG_64BIT, might as well use it.