Re: rename generic_defconfig to defconfig?

Jesse Barnes
2004-11-01T22:34:05Z

On Wednesday, September 22, 2004 4:23 pm, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Or maybe I'm the only one who's too lazy to mess with modules
> > for every build.
>
> No, I think you have a point there :) I *really* don't like having to copy
> modules over. If tg3 isn't builtin yet, it would be nice too.
>
> > I think generic_defconfig currently builds a McKinley kernel,
> > which may be the right thing, but you do have to remember
> > to switch back to CONFIG_ITANIUM for i2000.
>
> Right, but those boxes are mainly for the masochists among us, so I think a
> McKinley setting is the right choice.

Given the above, generic_defconfig seems to be in good shape to takeover as
defconfig. Tony?

Jesse