From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesse Barnes Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 22:34:05 +0000 Subject: Re: rename generic_defconfig to defconfig? Message-Id: <200411011434.05304.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> List-Id: References: <200409221713.12673.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <200409221713.12673.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, September 22, 2004 4:23 pm, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > Or maybe I'm the only one who's too lazy to mess with modules > > for every build. > > No, I think you have a point there :) I *really* don't like having to copy > modules over. If tg3 isn't builtin yet, it would be nice too. > > > I think generic_defconfig currently builds a McKinley kernel, > > which may be the right thing, but you do have to remember > > to switch back to CONFIG_ITANIUM for i2000. > > Right, but those boxes are mainly for the masochists among us, so I think a > McKinley setting is the right choice. Given the above, generic_defconfig seems to be in good shape to takeover as defconfig. Tony? Jesse