public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: davidm@hpl.hp.com
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [2.6 patch] IA64 irq.c: remove CONFIG_X86 code
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 00:19:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041119001915.GL4943@stusta.de> (raw)

I don't see hos this code could ever be used.

Am I correct or did I miss something?


diffstat output:
 arch/ia64/kernel/irq.c |   33 ---------------------------------
 1 files changed, 33 deletions(-)


Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>

--- linux-2.6.10-rc2-mm2-full/arch/ia64/kernel/irq.c.old	2004-11-19 01:14:22.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc2-mm2-full/arch/ia64/kernel/irq.c	2004-11-19 01:16:31.000000000 +0100
@@ -132,23 +132,7 @@
  * each architecture has to answer this themselves, it doesn't deserve
  * a generic callback i think.
  */
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86
-	printk(KERN_ERR "unexpected IRQ trap at vector %02x\n", irq);
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
-	/*
-	 * Currently unexpected vectors happen only on SMP and APIC.
-	 * We _must_ ack these because every local APIC has only N
-	 * irq slots per priority level, and a 'hanging, unacked' IRQ
-	 * holds up an irq slot - in excessive cases (when multiple
-	 * unexpected vectors occur) that might lock up the APIC
-	 * completely.
-	 */
-	ack_APIC_irq();
-#endif
-#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_IA64
 	printk(KERN_ERR "Unexpected irq vector 0x%x on CPU %u!\n", irq, smp_processor_id());
-#endif
 }
 
 /* startup is the same as "enable", shutdown is same as "disable" */
@@ -166,11 +150,6 @@
 };
 
 atomic_t irq_err_count;
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
-#ifdef APIC_MISMATCH_DEBUG
-atomic_t irq_mis_count;
-#endif
-#endif
 
 /*
  * Generic, controller-independent functions:
@@ -220,19 +199,7 @@
 			if (cpu_online(j))
 				seq_printf(p, "%10u ", nmi_count(j));
 		seq_putc(p, '\n');
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
-		seq_puts(p, "LOC: ");
-		for (j = 0; j < NR_CPUS; j++)
-			if (cpu_online(j))
-				seq_printf(p, "%10u ", irq_stat[j].apic_timer_irqs);
-		seq_putc(p, '\n');
-#endif
 		seq_printf(p, "ERR: %10u\n", atomic_read(&irq_err_count));
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
-#ifdef APIC_MISMATCH_DEBUG
-		seq_printf(p, "MIS: %10u\n", atomic_read(&irq_mis_count));
-#endif
-#endif
 	}
 	return 0;
 }

             reply	other threads:[~2004-11-19  0:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-19  0:19 Adrian Bunk [this message]
2004-11-19  6:42 ` [2.6 patch] IA64 irq.c: remove CONFIG_X86 code Luck, Tony

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041119001915.GL4943@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox