From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Ray Bryant <raybry@sgi.com>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
lse-tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
holt@sgi.com, Dean Roe <roe@sgi.com>, Brian Sumner <bls@sgi.com>,
John Hawkes <hawkes@tomahawk.engr.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] scalability of signal delivery for Posix Threads
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:54:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041122165425.GG21861@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jept25yggg.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 05:51:59PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> writes:
>
> > At least in traditional signal semantics you have to call sigaction
> > or signal in each signal handler to reset the signal. So that
> > assumption is not necessarily true.
>
> If you use sigaction then you get POSIX semantics, which don't have this
> problem.
It's just a common case where Ray's assumption is not true.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-22 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-22 15:51 scalability of signal delivery for Posix Threads Ray Bryant
2004-11-22 16:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-11-22 19:49 ` [Lse-tech] " Ray Bryant
2004-11-22 19:53 ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-22 16:22 ` [Lse-tech] " Andi Kleen
2004-11-22 16:51 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-11-22 16:54 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2004-11-22 18:56 ` Ray Bryant
2004-11-22 19:22 ` Ray Bryant
2004-11-22 17:23 ` Philip J. Mucci
2004-11-22 21:26 ` Boehm, Hans
2004-11-22 21:34 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-01 22:53 ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-22 21:27 ` Rick Lindsley
2004-11-22 23:39 ` Ray Bryant
2004-11-22 23:01 ` Boehm, Hans
2004-11-22 17:19 ` Robin Holt
2004-11-22 19:25 ` Ray Bryant
2004-11-23 20:42 ` Ray Bryant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041122165425.GG21861@wotan.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=bls@sgi.com \
--cc=hawkes@tomahawk.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=raybry@sgi.com \
--cc=roe@sgi.com \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox