From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:36:58 +0000 Subject: Re: fixing 2.6.10 UP builds Message-Id: <20050106213658.GA25747@infradead.org> List-Id: References: <20050106201427.GA6009@jale> In-Reply-To: <20050106201427.GA6009@jale> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:14:27PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: > Debian is putting together 2.6.10 packages, and we noticed that we still > need to forward port Jesse's patches. Attached is the patch Ubuntu forward > ported, and Debian is including. It would be great to get this merged upstream > so we don't need to port it for each release. should be mentioned it's original from Jesse Barnes (OTOH the numa.c copyright message implies that already). I'd like to second the request for inclusion, distributions like Debian really need a generic UP kernel, and having to forward-port patches everytime a new upstream release is out is extremly annoying. > --- kernel-source-2.6.8.defconfig/arch/ia64/kernel/cyclone.c 2004-08-14 13:07:37.000000000 -0600 > +++ kernel-source-2.6.8.newupfix.defconfig/arch/ia64/kernel/cyclone.c 2004-08-15 15:49:31.000000000 -0600 > @@ -1,8 +1,6 @@ > -#include > #include > #include > #include > -#include > > /* IBM Summit (EXA) Cyclone counter code*/ > #define CYCLONE_CBAR_ADDR 0xFEB00CD0 this hunk looks bogus.