public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: bk pull on ia64 linux tree
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:03:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200501252303.j0PN33A19074@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401121658240.14305@evo.osdl.org>

Hi Linus,

please do a

	bk pull http://lia64.bkbits.net/linux-ia64-release-2.6.11

This will update the files shown below ... the apparently huge change
to ptrace.c is mostly code reformatting to fit in 80 columns.

Thanks!

-Tony

 arch/ia64/ia32/ia32_signal.c |   20 -
 arch/ia64/ia32/sys_ia32.c    |   33 --
 arch/ia64/kernel/entry.S     |   18 -
 arch/ia64/kernel/perfmon.c   |   17 -
 arch/ia64/kernel/ptrace.c    |  687 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c    |    9 
 arch/ia64/kernel/sys_ia64.c  |    7 
 arch/ia64/kernel/traps.c     |   76 ++--
 arch/ia64/pci/pci.c          |    2 
 include/asm-ia64/unistd.h    |   14 
 10 files changed, 490 insertions(+), 393 deletions(-)

through these ChangeSets:

<tony.luck@intel.com> (05/01/25 1.2031)
   [IA64] entry.S: .align in .text sections is broken, use TEXT_ALIGN()
   
   A few reports of illegal instruction panics while trying to boot
   were tracked to this.  Fix by David Mosberger.
   
   Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>

<tony.luck@intel.com> (05/01/25 1.2030)
   [IA64] pci_sal_read seg limit is 65535, not 255
   
   Spotted by Andreas Schwab, fix from Matthew Wilcox
   and David Mosberger.
   
   Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>

<davidm@hpl.hp.com> (05/01/25 1.2029)
   [IA64] fix ptrace debug-register handling bug
   
   I noticed that the PTRACE_POKEUSR code incorrectly clears bits 56-58
   of _all_ debug registers.  The intention was to only clear it for
   odd-numbered registers, to ensure that user-level can only set
   user-level data/instruction-breakpoints.  Patch below fixes this problem.
   The patch also replaces explicit clearing of the single-step and
   taken-branch PSR bits with a call to ptrace_disable() for PTRACE_KILL.
   
   Signed-off-by: David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
   Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>

<davidm@hpl.hp.com> (05/01/25 1.2028)
   [IA64] clean up pt_regs accesses
   
   This patch replaces the idiom:
   
   	func (args..., long stack) {
   		struct pt_regs *regs = (struct pt_regs *) &stack;
   
   with the more commonly used:
   
   	func (args..., struct pt_regs regs) {
   
   The latter didn't used to work with the very earliest kernels and
   compilers (anybody remember egcs?) but gcc-3.3 and probably even
   gcc-2.96 don't have a problem with it anymore.
   
   The change also makes sparse happier, since it doesn't like it when
   you access memory past the end of the declared size of that variable.
   
   Signed-off-by: David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
   Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>

<tony.luck@intel.com> (05/01/25 1.2027)
   [IA64] ptrace.c: Format to make it fit in 80 cols.
   
   David thinks this might make Jesse and Willy happy (or
   at least happier).  If they can cope with line breaks
   before a binary operator, rather than after, then maybe
   it will :-)
   
   Signed-off-by: David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
   Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>

<kenneth.w.chen@intel.com> (05/01/25 1.2026)
   [IA64] Ensure that r9 can't be a NaT on return from sys_pipe()
   
   This version doesn't cost us any extra cycles.
   
   Signed-off-by: Ken Chen <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
   Signed-off-by: Rohit Seth <rohit.seth@intel.com>
   Acked-by: David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
   Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-01-25 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-13  0:59 bk pull on ia64 linux tree Linus Torvalds
2004-01-13  1:17 ` David Mosberger
2004-01-13  1:36 ` David Mosberger
2004-01-13 16:08 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-01-27  1:37 ` David Mosberger
2004-01-27 10:23 ` Jes Sorensen
2004-01-27 14:49 ` Martin Hicks
2004-01-27 16:22 ` David Mosberger
2004-01-27 21:57 ` David Mosberger
2004-02-11  5:19 ` David Mosberger
2004-02-12  1:05 ` Keith Owens
2004-02-12  1:31 ` David Mosberger
2004-02-13 22:44 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-13 22:46 ` David Mosberger
2004-02-23 19:12 ` David Mosberger
2004-03-12  5:37 ` David Mosberger
2004-03-17 19:14 ` David Mosberger
2004-03-25 20:30 ` David Mosberger
2004-04-09 16:05 ` David Mosberger
2004-04-23  6:48 ` David Mosberger
2004-04-29 22:21 ` David Mosberger
2004-04-30 17:49 ` David Mosberger
2004-05-03 22:58 ` David Mosberger
2004-05-11  7:02 ` David Mosberger
2004-05-11  7:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-05-11 18:39 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-05-21 21:45 ` David Mosberger
2004-06-05  5:57 ` David Mosberger
2004-06-19  6:58 ` David Mosberger
2004-06-30  0:04 ` David Mosberger
2004-06-30  0:44 ` Peter Chubb
2004-06-30  0:52 ` David Mosberger
2004-06-30 16:23 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-06 18:46 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-27  7:19 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-30 21:17 ` Luck, Tony
2004-08-04 22:05 ` Luck, Tony
2004-08-09 18:09 ` Luck, Tony
2004-08-23 21:23 ` tony.luck
2004-09-03  6:05 ` tony.luck
2004-09-09  5:51 ` Luck, Tony
2004-09-13 19:46 ` Luck, Tony
2004-09-16 22:39 ` Luck, Tony
2004-09-21 20:09 ` Luck, Tony
2004-09-22 23:14 ` Luck, Tony
2004-09-23 23:23 ` Luck, Tony
2004-09-28 18:34 ` Luck, Tony
2004-09-30 16:43 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-01 16:42 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-07 22:56 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-20  0:15 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-21  0:17 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-27  3:58 ` Luck, Tony
2004-11-04  0:22 ` Luck, Tony
2004-11-12 17:42 ` Luck, Tony
2005-01-19 18:52 ` Luck, Tony
2005-01-23  3:05 ` Luck, Tony
2005-01-24 16:53 ` Jesse Barnes
2005-01-25  6:30 ` Luck, Tony
2005-01-25 23:03 ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2005-03-18 23:30 ` Luck, Tony
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-28 20:39 David Mosberger
2003-08-16  1:20 ` David Mosberger
2003-09-09  6:43 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-16 22:27 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-17  3:36 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-25  6:44 ` David Mosberger
2003-11-11  0:55 ` David Mosberger
2003-11-11  2:38 ` David Mosberger
2003-11-12  7:18 ` David Mosberger
2003-11-21 22:12 ` David Mosberger
2003-11-26  7:55 ` David Mosberger
2003-12-21  8:05 ` David Mosberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200501252303.j0PN33A19074@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
    --to=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox