From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 01:09:47 +0000 Subject: Re: prezeroing V6 [2/3]: ScrubD Message-Id: <20050207170947.239f8696.akpm@osdl.org> List-Id: References: <1106828124.19262.45.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <20050202153256.GA19615@logos.cnet> <20050207163035.7596e4dd.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Christoph Lameter Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > What were the benchmarking results for this work? I think you had some, > > but this is pretty vital info, so it should be retained in the changelogs. > > Look at the early posts. I plan to put that up on the web. I have some > stats attached to the end of this message from an earlier post. But that's a patch-specific microbenchmark, isn't it? Has this work been benchmarked against real-world stuff? > > Should we be managing the kernel threads with the kthread() API? > > What would you like to manage? Startup, perhaps binding the threads to their cpus too.