Re: write_unlock: replace clear_bit with byte store

David Mosberger
2005-04-29T15:38:14Z

>>>>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 08:30:27 -0700 (PDT), Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com> said:

Christoph> So is my version of inline asm int the latest version
Christoph> from yesterday. There is an alternate version included
Christoph> for !ASM_SUPPORTED in C which does not use an nta store.

Yes, but _if_ it's a good idea to use .nta with GCC, there is no
reason not to do the same with ICC. Don't introduce unnecessary
divergence.

--david