From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 10:17:05 +0000 Subject: Re: IA64 implementation of timesource for new time of day subsystem Message-Id: <20050515101705.GC26242@wotan.suse.de> List-Id: References: <1116029796.26454.2.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> <1116029872.26454.4.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> <1116029971.26454.7.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> <1116030058.26454.10.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> <1116030139.26454.13.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> <428722E3.6040202@superbug.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <428722E3.6040202@superbug.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: James Courtier-Dutton Cc: Christoph Lameter , john stultz , lkml , Tim Schmielau , George Anzinger , albert@users.sourceforge.net, Ulrich Windl , Dominik Brodowski , David Mosberger , Andi Kleen , paulus@samba.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, keith maanthey , Chris McDermott , Max Asbock , mahuja@us.ibm.com, Nishanth Aravamudan , Darren Hart , "Darrick J. Wong" , Anton Blanchard , donf@us.ibm.com, mpm@selenic.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org > Will this mean that Linux will have a monotonic time source? 2.6 has had one for a long time (posix_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC)) -Andi