public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	long <tlnguyen@snoqualmie.dp.intel.com>,
	linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
	linuxppc64-dev <linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] IOCHK interface for I/O error handling/detecting
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 17:13:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050609171332.GC24611@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42A8386F.2060100@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 09:39:11PM +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
> Previously I had post two prototypes to LKML:
> 1) readX_check() interface
>    Added new kin of basic readX(), which returns its result of
>    I/O. But, it would not make sense that device driver have to
>    check and react after each of I/Os.
> 2) clear/read_pci_errors() interface
>    Added new pair-interface to sandwich I/Os. It makes sense that
>    device driver can adjust the number of checking I/Os and can
>    react all of them at once. However, this was not generalized,
>    so I thought that more expandable design would be required.
> 
> Today's patch is 3rd one - iochk_clear/read() interface.
> - This also adds pair-interface, but not to sandwich only readX().
>   Depends on platform, starting with ioreadX(), inX(), writeX()
>   if possible... and so on could be target of error checking.

It makes sense to sandwich other kinds of device accesses.  I don't
think the previous clear/read_pci_errors() interface was intended *only*
to sandwich readX().

> - Additionally adds special token - abstract "iocookie" structure
>   to control/identifies/manage I/Os, by passing it to OS.
>   Actual type of "iocookie" could be arch-specific. Device drivers
>   could use the iocookie structure without knowing its detail.

I'm not sure we need this.  Surely it can be deduced from the pci_dev or
struct device?

> Expected usage(sample) is:
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> #include <asm/io.h>
> 
> int sample_read_with_iochk(struct pci_dev *dev, u32 *buf, int words)
> {
>     unsigned long ofs = pci_resource_start(dev, 0) + DATA_OFFSET;
>     int i;
> 
>     /* Create magical cookie on the stack */
>     iocookie cookie;
> 
>     /* Critical section start */
>     iochk_clear(&dev, &cookie);
>     {
>         /* Get the whole packet of data */
>         for (i = 0; i < words; i++)
>             *buf++ = ioread32(dev, ofs);

You do know that ioread32() doesn't take a pci_dev, right?  I hope you
weren't counting on that for the rest of your implementation.

>     }
>     /* Critical section end. Did we have any trouble? */
>     if ( iochk_read(&cookie) ) return -1;
> 
>     /* OK, all system go. */
>     return 0;
> }

-- 
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon 
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince 
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep 
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-06-09 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-09 12:39 [PATCH 00/10] IOCHK interface for I/O error handling/detecting Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 12:48 ` [PATCH 01/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 16:53   ` Greg KH
2005-06-10 10:29     ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 12:50 ` [PATCH 02/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 12:51 ` [PATCH 03/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 16:57   ` Greg KH
2005-06-10 10:31     ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 17:20   ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-06-10 10:31     ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 12:53 ` [PATCH 04/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 16:57   ` Greg KH
2005-06-09 12:54 ` [PATCH 05/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 12:56 ` [PATCH 06/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 12:58 ` [PATCH 07/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 17:40   ` David Mosberger
2005-06-10 10:29     ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-10 17:25       ` David Mosberger
2005-06-13  6:54         ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 13:00 ` [PATCH 08/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 13:02 ` [PATCH 09/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 13:04 ` [PATCH 10/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 16:59 ` [PATCH 00/10] " Greg KH
2005-06-09 17:13 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2005-06-09 22:26   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-10 10:31     ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-10 10:30   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 17:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-06-10 10:32   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-10 23:25     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050609171332.GC24611@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    --to=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linas@austin.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    --cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tlnguyen@snoqualmie.dp.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox