From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
long <tlnguyen@snoqualmie.dp.intel.com>,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
linuxppc64-dev <linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] IOCHK interface for I/O error handling/detecting
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 17:13:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050609171332.GC24611@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42A8386F.2060100@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 09:39:11PM +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
> Previously I had post two prototypes to LKML:
> 1) readX_check() interface
> Added new kin of basic readX(), which returns its result of
> I/O. But, it would not make sense that device driver have to
> check and react after each of I/Os.
> 2) clear/read_pci_errors() interface
> Added new pair-interface to sandwich I/Os. It makes sense that
> device driver can adjust the number of checking I/Os and can
> react all of them at once. However, this was not generalized,
> so I thought that more expandable design would be required.
>
> Today's patch is 3rd one - iochk_clear/read() interface.
> - This also adds pair-interface, but not to sandwich only readX().
> Depends on platform, starting with ioreadX(), inX(), writeX()
> if possible... and so on could be target of error checking.
It makes sense to sandwich other kinds of device accesses. I don't
think the previous clear/read_pci_errors() interface was intended *only*
to sandwich readX().
> - Additionally adds special token - abstract "iocookie" structure
> to control/identifies/manage I/Os, by passing it to OS.
> Actual type of "iocookie" could be arch-specific. Device drivers
> could use the iocookie structure without knowing its detail.
I'm not sure we need this. Surely it can be deduced from the pci_dev or
struct device?
> Expected usage(sample) is:
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> #include <asm/io.h>
>
> int sample_read_with_iochk(struct pci_dev *dev, u32 *buf, int words)
> {
> unsigned long ofs = pci_resource_start(dev, 0) + DATA_OFFSET;
> int i;
>
> /* Create magical cookie on the stack */
> iocookie cookie;
>
> /* Critical section start */
> iochk_clear(&dev, &cookie);
> {
> /* Get the whole packet of data */
> for (i = 0; i < words; i++)
> *buf++ = ioread32(dev, ofs);
You do know that ioread32() doesn't take a pci_dev, right? I hope you
weren't counting on that for the rest of your implementation.
> }
> /* Critical section end. Did we have any trouble? */
> if ( iochk_read(&cookie) ) return -1;
>
> /* OK, all system go. */
> return 0;
> }
--
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-09 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-09 12:39 [PATCH 00/10] IOCHK interface for I/O error handling/detecting Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 12:48 ` [PATCH 01/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 16:53 ` Greg KH
2005-06-10 10:29 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 12:50 ` [PATCH 02/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 12:51 ` [PATCH 03/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 16:57 ` Greg KH
2005-06-10 10:31 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 17:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-06-10 10:31 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 12:53 ` [PATCH 04/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 16:57 ` Greg KH
2005-06-09 12:54 ` [PATCH 05/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 12:56 ` [PATCH 06/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 12:58 ` [PATCH 07/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 17:40 ` David Mosberger
2005-06-10 10:29 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-10 17:25 ` David Mosberger
2005-06-13 6:54 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 13:00 ` [PATCH 08/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 13:02 ` [PATCH 09/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 13:04 ` [PATCH 10/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 16:59 ` [PATCH 00/10] " Greg KH
2005-06-09 17:13 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2005-06-09 22:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-10 10:31 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-10 10:30 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 17:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-06-10 10:32 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-10 23:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050609171332.GC24611@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linas@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=tlnguyen@snoqualmie.dp.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox