Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags

Ingo Molnar
2005-07-29T09:01:22Z

* Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

> >>processes 1 2 3 4
> >>
> >>2.6.13-rc4: 187, 183, 179 260, 259, 256 340, 320, 349 504, 496, 500
> >>no wake-bal: 180, 180, 177 254, 254, 253 268, 270, 348 345, 290, 500
> >>
> >>Numbers are MB/s, higher is better.
> >
> >
> >what type of network was used - localhost or a real one?
> >
>
> Localhost. Yeah it isn't a real world test, but it does show the
> erratic behaviour without wake affine.

yeah - fine enough. (It's not representative for IO workloads, but it's
representative for local IPC workloads, just wanted to know precisely
which workload it is.)

Ingo