From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: purpose of modular mca recovery
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 20:39:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050809203915.GB28917@lst.de> (raw)
is there any reason to built this code modular? After all it would
usually not be loaded when it was needed. Not allowing modular mca
recovery would help greatly because it's using some symbols that we'd
prefer to unexport before chaning some implementation details
(tasklist_lock and maybe force_sig)
next reply other threads:[~2005-08-09 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-09 20:39 Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2005-08-09 20:45 ` purpose of modular mca recovery Russ Anderson
2005-08-09 20:57 ` Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050809203915.GB28917@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox