From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Jackson Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 00:57:51 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc6] cpu_exclusive sched domains build fix Message-Id: <20050824175751.3a45d031.pj@sgi.com> List-Id: References: <20050824111510.11478.49764.sendpatchset@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com> <20050824112640.GB5197@in.ibm.com> <20050824044648.66f7e25a.pj@sgi.com> <430C617E.8080002@yahoo.com.au> <20050824133107.2ca733c3.pj@sgi.com> <430D0A95.30208@yahoo.com.au> In-Reply-To: <430D0A95.30208@yahoo.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Nick Piggin Cc: dino@in.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org, mingo@elte.hu, hawkes@sgi.com Nick wrote: > and that it looks like what I was thinking about. Ok - I almost have my crosstool installation healthy again. I will actually see to it that my patch builds this time for whatever arch's I can test on, and send this simple disabling of sched domain mangling from cpuset-land as a real patch. I have a couple other commitments - it will be 6 to 12 hours before I send it in, unless someone asks for a half-baked version sooner. > We need to revert to a stable behaviour, however we can't risk > major surgery to get there. Yup. Agreed. Thanks for looking into this, Nick. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401