From: tony.luck@intel.com
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: testing mca/init patch
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 23:43:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200508312343.j7VNhFOZ012157@agluck-lia64.sc.intel.com> (raw)
To make life easier for testers, I've applied Keith's patches
and put them into my test tree.
I locally applied one insignificant change in ia64_init_handler()
to print the cpu number and the state of sos->monarch in the
initial printk in that routine (because there was once a bug where
Tiger SAL sent all cpus to the registered "master" INIT entry point.
The output below shows that I have a good SAL that didn't do this).
I haven't applied this change to my GIT tree.
Here's a trimmed down version of the output after I hit the INIT
button with some comments by me about timing inside {} brackets:
{nothing for a few seconds ... felt like more than 5}
CPU1: Entered OS INIT handler. PSPÿe301a0 monarch=1
Delaying for 5 seconds...
{another delay, perhaps this one was 5 seconds}
Processes interrupted by INIT - 0 (cpu 1 task 0xe0000001ffe90000)
Backtrace of pid 1 (init)
Call Trace:
[<a000000100704ed0>] schedule+0xb90/0x14e0
spà000001fef77d80 bspà000001fef710e0
[<a000000100706f40>] schedule_timeout+0xe0/0x1e0
spà000001fef77d90 bspà000001fef710a8
[<a000000100166710>] do_select+0x330/0x7e0
spà000001fef77dd0 bspà000001fef70f78
[<a000000100167130>] sys_select+0x570/0x9a0
spà000001fef77df0 bspà000001fef70e98
[<a00000010000bd20>] ia64_ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x20
spà000001fef77e30 bspà000001fef70e98
[<a000000000010640>] __kernel_syscall_via_break+0x0/0x20
spà000001fef78000 bspà000001fef70e98
{snipped dumps of lots of processes, all looked plausible}
Backtrace of pid 4684 (bash)
Call Trace:
[<a000000100704ed0>] schedule+0xb90/0x14e0
spà0000018659fd60 bspà00000186599118
[<a000000100707010>] schedule_timeout+0x1b0/0x1e0
spà0000018659fd70 bspà000001865990e0
[<a00000010043e9a0>] read_chan+0x5c0/0x13c0
spà0000018659fdb0 bspà00000186598fc0
[<a000000100430460>] tty_read+0x1c0/0x1e0
spà0000018659fe20 bspà00000186598f78
[<a000000100135a20>] vfs_read+0x180/0x380
spà0000018659fe20 bspà00000186598f20
[<a000000100136250>] sys_read+0x70/0xe0
spà0000018659fe20 bspà00000186598ea8
[<a00000010000bd20>] ia64_ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x20
spà0000018659fe30 bspà00000186598ea8
[<a000000000010640>] __kernel_syscall_via_break+0x0/0x20
spà000001865a0000 bspà00000186598ea8
INIT dump complete. Monarch on cpu 1 returning to normal service.
{another several second delay}
CPU3: Entered OS INIT handler. PSPÿe301a0 monarch=0
{another several second delay}
CPU2: Entered OS INIT handler. PSPÿe301a0 monarch=0
{another several second delay}
CPU0: Entered OS INIT handler. PSPÿe301a0 monarch=0
{another several second delay}
CPU1: Entered OS INIT handler. PSPÿe301a0 monarch=0
cpu 1, INIT inconsistent r12 and r13, original stack not modified
{system hung}
The above is at least as good as the previous behaivour, but something
bad happened there at the end. There were also more delays than I
was expecting.
-Tony
next reply other threads:[~2005-08-31 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-31 23:43 tony.luck [this message]
2005-09-01 1:38 ` testing mca/init patch david mosberger
2005-09-01 3:20 ` Keith Owens
2005-09-01 4:58 ` david mosberger
2005-09-01 5:30 ` Keith Owens
2005-09-01 16:43 ` Luck, Tony
2005-09-01 19:35 ` david mosberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200508312343.j7VNhFOZ012157@agluck-lia64.sc.intel.com \
--to=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox