From: hawkes@sgi.com
To: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, hawkes@sgi.com,
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] 2.6.13: cpuset + build_sched_domains() fix
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 16:21:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050903162113.22561.80700.sendpatchset@tomahawk.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
Dinakar Guniguntala's "dynamic sched domains" functionality was been merged
into 2.6.13-rcN, although it was disabled at the last minute in the final
2.6.13 because it triggers a fatal bug for NUMA systems with more than one
CPU per node.
Conceptually, when a user/sysadmin declares a cpu-exclusive (a.k.a.
"isolated") cpuset, the cpuset code calls build_sched_domains() to isolate
the cpu-exclusive CPU(s) such that these CPU(s) only load-balance among
themselves and the remaining CPU(s) only load-balance among themselves.
Thus, the non-isolated CPU(s) spend no load-balancing effort trying to
offload tasks cannot be migrated away from their isolated CPU(s).
Otherwise, for example, if an isolated CPU were to be the systemwide
most-heavily-loaded CPU, then this would effectively disable all dynamic
load-balancing in the Scheduler because the non-isolated CPU(s) would
keep making futile efforts to offload isolated, non-migratable tasks.
Unfortunately, the 2.6.13 bug is that build_sched_domains() expects that
a sched domain will include all the CPUs of each node in the domain; more
accurately, that no node will belong in both an isolated cpuset and a
non-isolated cpuset. Declaring a cpuset that violates this presumption
will produce flawed data structures and will oops the kernel. Hence,
for 2.6.13, the cpuset code that would otherwise call build_sched_domains()
is #ifdef'ed disabled.
To trigger the problem (on a NUMA system with >1 CPUs per node, if the
kernel/cpuset.c disabling #ifdef is removed):
cd /dev/cpuset
mkdir newcpuset
cd newcpuset
echo 0 >cpus
echo 0 >mems
echo 1 >cpu_exclusive
The fix is in three parts:
1) A contribution from Ingo Molnar to pull the arch-specific ia64
build_sched_domains() (et al) routines into kernel/sched.c to form
a unified set of build and destroy routines.
2) My fix to the 2.6.13 problem: dynamically allocate sched_group_nodes[]
and sched_group_allnodes[] for each invocation of build_sched_domains(),
rather than use global arrays for these structures, taking care to
remember kmalloc() addresses so that arch_destroy_sched_domains() can
properly kfree() them.
3) Undo the #ifdef disabling hack that was put into 2.6.13 to disable
dynamic sched domains.
This is a patch against 2.6.13. I have posted a previous similar patch
against 2.6.13-mm1.
John Hawkes
reply other threads:[~2005-09-03 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050903162113.22561.80700.sendpatchset@tomahawk.engr.sgi.com \
--to=hawkes@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox