From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:52:03 +0000 Subject: Re: [ACPI] [PATCH] ACPI: implement UUID-labelled vendor-defined resources Message-Id: <20050919155203.GA24346@infradead.org> List-Id: References: <971FCB6690CD0E4898387DBF7552B90E02C0B5F2@orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <971FCB6690CD0E4898387DBF7552B90E02C0B5F2-sBd4vmA9Se5Qxe9IK+vIArfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Moore, Robert" Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , "Brown, Len" , Alex Williamson , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, "Luck, Tony" , linux-ia64-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 02:56:31PM -0700, Moore, Robert wrote: > And to make things even more interesting, the base ACPICA code looks > nothing like the final Linux version of the code; it is converted on the > fly before every release to Linux. So the Linux code is not the "preferred from of modification"? You're on an extremly slipperly slope vs the GPL there. Not that I want to sue your or intel, but this is certainly not in the spirit of the License.