From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:48:36 +0000 Subject: Re: [ACPI] [PATCH] ACPI: implement UUID-labelled vendor-defined resources Message-Id: <20050922174835.GA27011@elf.ucw.cz> List-Id: References: <971FCB6690CD0E4898387DBF7552B90E02C0B5F2@orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> <20050919155203.GA24346@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20050919155203.GA24346-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: "Moore, Robert" , Bjorn Helgaas , "Brown, Len" , Alex Williamson , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, "Luck, Tony" , linux-ia64-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Hi! > > And to make things even more interesting, the base ACPICA code looks > > nothing like the final Linux version of the code; it is converted on the > > fly before every release to Linux. > > So the Linux code is not the "preferred from of modification"? You're > on an extremly slipperly slope vs the GPL there. Not that I want to > sue your or intel, but this is certainly not in the spirit of the > License. Actually, they change it to conform to kernel coding-style... That should be okay. Pavel -- if you have sharp zaurus hardware you don't need... you know my address