public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: ptrace find_thread_for_addr() procedure
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:34:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051011213426.GA16966@sgi.com> (raw)

In arch/ia64/kernel/ptrace.c there is a test for a peek or poke of a
register image (in register backing storage).
The test can be unnecessarily long (and occurs while holding the tasklist_lock).
Especially long on a large system with thousands of active tasks.

The ptrace caller (presumably a debugger) specifies the pid of
its target and an address to peek or poke.  But the debugger could be
attached to several tasks.
The idea of find_thread_for_addr() is to find whether the target address
is in the RBS for one of those tasks.

Currently it searches the thread-list of the target pid.  If that search
does not find a match, and the shared mm-struct's user count indicates
that there are other tasks sharing this address space (a rare occurrence),
a search is made of all the tasks in the system.

Another approach could shorten this procedure for the rare case that
a task outside the thread-list shares the address space.

It depends upon the fact that in order to peek or poke from/to any task,
the debugger must first attach to that task.  And when it does, the
attached task is made a child of the debugger (is chained to its children list).

Therefore we could search just the debugger's children list.

I propose the following:

--- ptrace.before	2005-09-30 15:58:09 -05:00
+++ ptrace.c	2005-10-10 17:21:20 -05:00
@@ -569,6 +569,7 @@
 {
 	struct task_struct *g, *p;
 	struct mm_struct *mm;
+	struct list_head *this, *next;
 	int mm_users;
 
 	if (!(mm = get_task_mm(child)))
@@ -579,28 +580,21 @@
 		goto out;		/* not multi-threaded */
 
 	/*
-	 * First, traverse the child's thread-list.  Good for scalability with
-	 * NPTL-threads.
+	 * Traverse the current process' children list.  Every task that
+	 * one attaches to becomes a child.  And it is only attached children
+	 * of the debugger that are of interest (ptrace_check_attach checks
+	 * for this).
 	 */
-	p = child;
-	do {
-		if (thread_matches(p, addr)) {
-			child = p;
-			goto out;
-		}
-		if (mm_users-- <= 1)
-			goto out;
-	} while ((p = next_thread(p)) != child);
-
-	do_each_thread(g, p) {
-		if (child->mm != mm)
+ 	list_for_each_safe(this, next, &current->children) {
+		p = list_entry(this, struct task_struct, sibling);
+		if (p->mm != mm)
 			continue;
-
 		if (thread_matches(p, addr)) {
 			child = p;
 			goto out;
 		}
-	} while_each_thread(g, p);
+	}
+
   out:
 	mmput(mm);
 	return child;

                 reply	other threads:[~2005-10-11 21:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051011213426.GA16966@sgi.com \
    --to=cpw@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox