From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] 4 level page table bug fix in vhpt_miss
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:38:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200511170938.jAH9cgg11411@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
From source code inspection, I think there is a bug with 4 level
page table with vhpt_miss handler. In the code path of rechecking
page table entry against previously read value after tlb insertion,
*pte value in register r18 was overwritten with value newly read
from pud pointer, render the check of new *pte against previous
*pte completely wrong. Though the bug is none fatal and the penalty
is to purge the entry and retry. For functional correctness, it
should be fixed. The fix is to use a different register so new
*pud don't trash *pte. (btw, the comments in the cmp statement is
wrong as well, which I will address in the next patch).
Signed-off-by: Ken Chen <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
--- ./arch/ia64/kernel/ivt.S.orig 2005-11-16 23:35:27.086799703 -0800
+++ ./arch/ia64/kernel/ivt.S 2005-11-17 00:14:51.247903555 -0800
@@ -209,13 +209,13 @@ ENTRY(vhpt_miss)
ld8 r25=[r21] // read L4 entry again
ld8 r26=[r17] // read L3 PTE again
#ifdef CONFIG_PGTABLE_4
- ld8 r18=[r28] // read L2 entry again
+ ld8 r19=[r28] // read L2 entry again
#endif
cmp.ne p6,p7=r0,r0
;;
cmp.ne.or.andcm p6,p7=r26,r20 // did L3 entry change
#ifdef CONFIG_PGTABLE_4
- cmp.ne.or.andcm p6,p7=r29,r18 // did L4 PTE change
+ cmp.ne.or.andcm p6,p7=r19,r29 // did L4 PTE change
#endif
mov r27=PAGE_SHIFT<<2
;;
next reply other threads:[~2005-11-17 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-17 9:38 Chen, Kenneth W [this message]
2005-11-17 18:51 ` [patch] 4 level page table bug fix in vhpt_miss Robin Holt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200511170938.jAH9cgg11411@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox