public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Prevent sn2 ptc code from executing on all ia64 subarches
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:14:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200512131014.58643.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051121180016.24224.2378.sendpatchset@prarit.boston.redhat.com>

On Tuesday 13 December 2005 8:42 am, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> I spent the past day or so looking at a couple of solutions to this problem and 
> the only solution that appears viable is to (as stated previously) create new 
> initcalls of the form
> 
> platform_calltype_initcall(fn,platform)
> 
> ex)
> 	platform_device_initcall(sn_prarit_driver, "sn2");
> 
> which would check the platform type prior to loading a kernel.

I think this is too complicated.  Initcall ordering is fragile as it
is.  I don't think there are enough users of this sort of functionality
to justify complicating it even more with a platform identifier.

> Suggestions/comments?  Anyone think this is too much bother for the original 
> issue of avoiding
> 
> 	if (!ia64_platform_is("sn2"))
> 		return -ENOSYS;

But I still think it is important to keep these ia64_platform_is()
checks out of generic init functions.  There's just too much chance
of inadvertently breaking non-SN platforms.

Can you use the existing machine vector infrastructure to solve this
problem?  For example, what if you added a "platform_device_setup()"
hook that is a no-op on most platforms, but maps to sn_device_setup()
in the SN2 machine vector?  platform_device_setup() would itself be
called as a device_initcall().

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-12-13 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-21 18:00 [PATCH]: Prevent sn2 ptc code from executing on all ia64 subarches Prarit Bhargava
2005-12-09 17:11 ` Robin Holt
2005-12-09 17:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2005-12-09 17:54 ` Luck, Tony
2005-12-09 18:22 ` Prarit Bhargava
2005-12-09 18:31 ` Prarit Bhargava
2005-12-09 18:38 ` Luck, Tony
2005-12-09 19:41 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-12-13 14:06 ` Prarit Bhargava
2005-12-13 15:10 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-12-13 15:42 ` Prarit Bhargava
2005-12-13 15:43 ` Prarit Bhargava
2005-12-13 16:03 ` Prarit Bhargava
2005-12-13 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-12-13 17:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2005-12-13 17:24 ` Luck, Tony
2005-12-13 17:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2005-12-13 17:57 ` Luck, Tony
2005-12-13 18:26 ` Prarit Bhargava
2005-12-13 20:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2005-12-14 13:17 ` Prarit Bhargava
2005-12-15 14:33 ` Prarit Bhargava
2005-12-15 15:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2005-12-15 20:56 ` Prarit Bhargava
2005-12-15 21:08 ` Luck, Tony

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200512131014.58643.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --to=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox