From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Grundler Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:59:07 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] C-language equivalents of include/asm-*/bitops.h Message-Id: <20060125205907.GF9995@esmail.cup.hp.com> List-Id: References: <20060125112625.GA18584@miraclelinux.com> <20060125113206.GD18584@miraclelinux.com> <20060125200250.GA26443@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20060125200250.GA26443@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Akinobu Mita Cc: Linux Kernel Development , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 08:02:50PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > I've not really looked at the rest because I haven't figured out which > bits will be used on ARM and which won't - which I think is another > problem with this patch set. I'll look again later tonight. Russell, I have the same problem. This file is 920 lines long and contains 7 distinct changes according to the (well written) notes. Akinobu, I appreciate your work - but could this particular peice be split up into 7 chunks? That would make checking the behavior of something like HAVE_ARCH_FFZ_BITOPS easier for each arch. thanks, grant