From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mita@miraclelinux.com (Akinobu Mita) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 06:40:34 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/12] generic hweight{32,16,8}() Message-Id: <20060127064034.GB8166@miraclelinux.com> List-Id: References: <20060125112625.GA18584@miraclelinux.com> <20060125113206.GD18584@miraclelinux.com> <20060125200250.GA26443@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20060125205907.GF9995@esmail.cup.hp.com> <20060126032713.GA9984@miraclelinux.com> <20060126033613.GG11138@miraclelinux.com> <661de9470601252312m1f9c9256peb79451e49fc8662@mail.gmail.com> <20060127045522.GA7587@miraclelinux.com> <661de9470601262140x4e870cd5me9ba0f8e9d52f421@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <661de9470601262140x4e870cd5me9ba0f8e9d52f421@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Balbir Singh Cc: Grant Grundler , Linux Kernel Development , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 11:10:29AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > On 1/27/06, Akinobu Mita wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 12:42:09PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > > > > > > +static inline unsigned int hweight32(unsigned int w) > > > > +{ > > > > + unsigned int res = (w & 0x55555555) + ((w >> 1) & 0x55555555); > > > > + res = (res & 0x33333333) + ((res >> 2) & 0x33333333); > > > > + res = (res & 0x0F0F0F0F) + ((res >> 4) & 0x0F0F0F0F); > > > > + res = (res & 0x00FF00FF) + ((res >> 8) & 0x00FF00FF); > > > > + return (res & 0x0000FFFF) + ((res >> 16) & 0x0000FFFF); > > > > +} > > > > + > > > > > > This can be replaced with > > > > > > register int res=w; > > > res=res-((res>>1)&0x55555555); > > > res=(res&0x33333333)+((res>>2)&0x33333333); > > > res=(res+(res>>4))&0x0f0f0f0f; > > > res=res+(res>>8); > > > return (res+(res>>16)) & 0xff; > > > > Probably you are right. > > Unfortunately, it is difficult for me to prove that sane equivalence. > > > > Well, a proof is not difficult. This is a well tested proven piece of > code published by Don Knuth. If you need a proof, I can provide one. Thanks, I want.