From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Richard Harke <rharke@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:58:39 +0000
Subject: Re: [patch 1/6] align kenrel rbs on 128 byte
Message-Id: <200601311158.39058.rharke@earthlink.net>
List-Id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
References: <200601310848.k0V8mbg11087@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <200601310848.k0V8mbg11087@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org

On Tue January 31 2006 08:25, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:

.
.
.>
> Yeah, if nobody cares about UP performance. SMP_CACHE_BYTES is 8 bytes
> on UP kernel (though it doesn't seem that anyone cares about UP).  I
Well, I care about UP. But HP, Intel and SGI have made it pretty clear
they don't care about UP (or the customers that have UP machines)
> will consult Tony to see what he likes.  I might settle with
> L1_CACHE_BYTES.  I can just see people is going yell at me for having
> 125 column line :-p  :-))
>
> - Ken
>
> -