From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Fix race in the accessed/dirty bit handlers
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 21:59:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603082159.k28Lx3g12281@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603071901420.2463@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Christoph Lameter wrote on Wednesday, March 08, 2006 7:33 AM
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Robin Holt wrote:
> > Are you sure this does not lead to a data integrity issue. What if we
> > have a clean writable page. If we get started on the dirty handler and
> > the pte gets zapped from under us, the page would not get marked as dirty
> > (pte had not gotten updated yet) and the process would continue running.
>
> No the process would not continue running. The page is not present and
> therefore the page fault handler gets involved next to get the page back.
>
> The page fault handler gets invoked with the write flag set. So it
> will bring back the page and mark it dirty. Then it will return to the
> process which will perform the write operation.
What happens to a scenario where you zap the pte right after dirty bit
handler just finished. Won't you lost that "dirty" information?
- Ken
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-08 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-08 3:05 Fix race in the accessed/dirty bit handlers Christoph Lameter
2006-03-08 10:48 ` Robin Holt
2006-03-08 15:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-08 21:59 ` Chen, Kenneth W [this message]
2006-03-08 22:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-08 22:25 ` Luck, Tony
2006-03-08 22:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-08 23:56 ` Luck, Tony
2006-03-09 0:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-09 13:35 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-03-09 16:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-09 18:09 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-03-09 18:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-09 18:33 ` David Mosberger-Tang
2006-03-09 19:44 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-10 9:47 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-03-10 9:54 ` Christian Hildner
2006-03-10 10:40 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-03-10 16:47 ` Luck, Tony
2006-03-10 17:11 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-03-10 17:22 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-10 17:28 ` Luck, Tony
2006-03-10 17:29 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-13 9:13 ` Zoltan Menyhart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200603082159.k28Lx3g12281@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox