public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de,
	openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
	matthew.e.tolentino@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.15] ia64: use i386 dmi_scan.c
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 23:54:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060317155445.602f07b9.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060106223932.GB9230@lists.us.dell.com>

Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com> wrote:
>
> +dmi_scan-y			+= ../../i386/kernel/dmi_scan.o
>

There's a patch in Andi's queue
(ftp://ftp.firstfloor.org/pub/ak/x86_64/quilt-current/patches/feature/dmi-early)
which adds

#include <asm/dmi.h>

into arch/i386/kernel/dmi_scan.c.

hence with both your patch and Andi's patch applied, ia64 won't compile due
to missing asm/dmi.h.

I've been reverting Andi's patch due to this, but it seems reasonable that
dmi_scan.c be able to include asm/dmi.h..

So to get these thing to play together properly we'll need an
include/asm-ia64/dmi.h which does the stuff which is in the two dmi.h's
which Andi's patch creates.

Is that something you could take a look at, please?

You'll need a kernel to patch, so I'll include this in next -mm:

--- /dev/null	Thu Apr 11 07:25:15 2002
+++ 25-akpm/include/asm-ia64/dmi.h	Fri Mar 17 15:49:50 2006
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+#ifndef _ASM_DMI_H
+#define _ASM_DMI_H 1
+
+#include <asm/io.h>
+
+#endif
diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/dmi_scan.c~ia64-use-i386-dmi_scanc-fix arch/i386/kernel/dmi_scan.c
--- 25/arch/i386/kernel/dmi_scan.c~ia64-use-i386-dmi_scanc-fix	Fri Mar 17 15:49:37 2006
+++ 25-akpm/arch/i386/kernel/dmi_scan.c	Fri Mar 17 15:49:37 2006
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ void __init dmi_scan_machine(void)
                 * needed during early boot.  This also means we can
                 * iounmap the space when we're done with it.
 		*/
-		p = ioremap((unsigned long)efi.smbios, 0x10000);
+		p = dmi_ioremap((unsigned long)efi.smbios, 0x10000);
 		if (p = NULL)
 			goto out;
 
@@ -235,11 +235,11 @@ void __init dmi_scan_machine(void)
 	}
 	else {
 		/*
-		 * no iounmap() for that ioremap(); it would be a no-op, but it's
-		 * so early in setup that sucker gets confused into doing what
-		 * it shouldn't if we actually call it.
+		 * no iounmap() for that ioremap(); it would be a no-op, but
+		 * it's so early in setup that sucker gets confused into doing
+		 * what it shouldn't if we actually call it.
 		 */
-		p = ioremap(0xF0000, 0x10000);
+		p = dmi_ioremap(0xF0000, 0x10000);
 		if (p = NULL)
 			goto out;
 
_


I assume that those ioremap->dmi_ioremap conversions are appropriate.

It could be that Andi's changes break the ia64 dmi impementation - I don't
know.  I guess it's OK if ia64 is not doing a scan "early".

The above might not compile, but I'll make sure that it does so before
releasing next -mm.

So.  Bottom line: please test the ia64 dmi patches in next -mm, send any
needed fixups, thanks.


We should move this code into drivers/ or something - #including other
architecture's stuff like this is awful.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-03-17 23:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-04 22:16 [PATCH 2.6.15 1/2] ia64: use i386 dmi_scan.c Matt Domsch
2006-01-04 22:36 ` Alex Williamson
2006-01-04 23:29   ` Matt Domsch
2006-01-05 16:41     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-01-05 17:37       ` Matt Domsch
2006-01-05 17:54         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-01-06  0:02           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-01-06 17:15             ` Matt Domsch
2006-01-04 22:55 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-06 17:21 ` [PATCH 2.6.15] " Matt Domsch
2006-01-06 19:03   ` Tolentino, Matthew E
2006-01-06 22:36     ` Matt Domsch
2006-01-06 22:39   ` Matt Domsch
2006-01-14  0:24     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-01-14  0:45       ` Alan Cox
2006-01-14  1:19       ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-14  5:05         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-01-18  0:17       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-01-18  2:32         ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-18 15:53           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-01-18 17:29         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-01-18 18:11           ` [Openipmi-developer] " Matt Domsch
2006-01-19 20:10             ` [PATCH 0/5] ia64 ioremap, DMI, EFI system table Bjorn Helgaas
2006-01-19 20:12               ` [PATCH 1/5] EFI, /dev/mem: simplify efi_mem_attribute_range() Bjorn Helgaas
2006-01-19 20:12               ` [PATCH 2/5] ia64: ioremap: check EFI for valid memory attributes Bjorn Helgaas
2006-01-19 20:13               ` [PATCH 3/5] DMI: only ioremap stuff we actually need Bjorn Helgaas
2006-01-19 20:13               ` [PATCH 4/5] EFI: keep physical table addresses in efi structure Bjorn Helgaas
2006-01-19 20:14               ` [PATCH 5/5] ACPI: clean up memory attribute checking for map/read/write Bjorn Helgaas
2006-01-30 17:11               ` [Openipmi-developer] [PATCH 0/5] ia64 ioremap, DMI, EFI system table Matt Domsch
2006-03-17 23:54     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-03-18 14:56       ` [PATCH 2.6.15] ia64: use i386 dmi_scan.c Matt Domsch
2006-03-18 15:43         ` Matt Domsch
2006-03-18 19:51           ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-19 14:19   ` Tolentino, Matthew E

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060317155445.602f07b9.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=Matt_Domsch@dell.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.e.tolentino@intel.com \
    --cc=openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox