From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 20:32:53 +0000 Subject: Re: [5/5] move_pages: 32bit support (i386,x86_64 and ia64) Message-Id: <20060524133253.23fe19a2.akpm@osdl.org> List-Id: References: <20060523174344.10156.66845.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <20060523174410.10156.43268.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20060523174410.10156.43268.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Christoph Lameter , Jens Axboe Cc: hugh@veritas.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, linux-mm@kvack.org, ak@suse.de, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com Christoph Lameter wrote: > > sys_move_pages() support for 32bit (i386 plus ia64 and x86_64 compat layers) > > Add support for move_pages() on i386 and also add the > compat functions necessary to run 32 bit binaries on x86_64 and ia64. > > Add compat_sys_move_pages to both the x86_64 and the ia64 32bit binary > layer. Note that both are not up to date so I added the missing pieces. > Not sure if this is done the right way. > > This probably needs some fixups: > > 1. What about sys_vmsplice on x86_64? > > 2. There is a whole range of syscalls missing for ia64 that I basically > interpolated from elsewhere. I dropped the ia64 bits - looks like that's all on death row anyway. The omission of sys_vmsplice() from the x86 syscall table does appear to be, umm, a glaring omission. Jens, what's up?