Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/9] conditionally define generic get_order() (ARCH_HAS_GET_ORDER)

Haavard Skinnemoen
2006-08-31T18:41:04Z

On 8/31/06, Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> diff -puN mm/Kconfig~generic-get_order mm/Kconfig
> --- threadalloc/mm/Kconfig~generic-get_order 2006-08-30 15:14:56.000000000 -0700
> +++ threadalloc-dave/mm/Kconfig 2006-08-30 15:15:00.000000000 -0700
> @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
> +config ARCH_HAVE_GET_ORDER
> + def_bool y
> + depends on IA64 || PPC32 || XTENSA
> +

I have a feeling this has been discussed before, but wouldn't it be
better to let each architecture define this in its own Kconfig?

At some point, I have to add AVR32 to that list, and if one or more
other architectures need to do the same, there will be rejects.

Haavard