From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "tony.luck@intel.com" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, GOTO <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] cpu to node relationship fixup take2 [1/2]
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:06:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060922170604.745d662a.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060922152447.42a83860.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:24:47 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> I rewrote the whoe patch..
>
Well I don't recall ever having seen a "cpu to node relationship fixup
take1" and I have generally lost the plot regarding these fixes.
What I have now is:
cpu-to-node-relationship-fixup-take2.patch
cpu-to-node-relationship-fixup-map-cpu-to-node.patch
I shall send those patches in reply to this email. Please confirm that
these are correct, sufficient, complete, etc.
Do you believe these are needed in 2.6.18.x?
Please follow the guidelines in
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt a little more
closely, especially regarding Subject:s
Please bear in mind that I'm sitting on thousands of patches from hundreds
of developers, that I process sometimes hundreds of patches per day and I
am very easily confused. Retaining consistent and well-thought out
Subject:s and referring to previous patches via their precise Subject:s
really helps, thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-23 0:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-22 6:24 [BUGFIX][PATCH] cpu to node relationship fixup take2 [1/2] KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-09-22 6:27 ` [BUGFIX][PATCH] cpu to node relationship fixup take2 [2/2] map cpu KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-09-26 11:23 ` [BUGFIX][PATCH] cpu to node relationship fixup take2 [2/2] map bibo,mao
2006-09-26 11:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-09-26 11:48 ` bibo,mao
2006-09-23 0:06 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-09-23 0:06 ` [BUGFIX][PATCH] cpu to node relationship fixup take2 [1/2] Andrew Morton
2006-09-23 0:07 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-23 1:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-09-23 1:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060922170604.745d662a.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox