From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:09:51 +0000
Subject: Re: 2.6.18 perfmon new code base + libpfm + pfmon
Message-Id: <20060926220951.39bd344f.akpm@osdl.org>
List-Id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20060926143420.GF14550@frankl.hpl.hp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060926143420.GF14550@frankl.hpl.hp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: eranian@hpl.hp.com
Cc: perfmon@napali.hpl.hp.com, perfctr-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net

On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:34:20 -0700
Stephane Eranian <eranian@hpl.hp.com> wrote:

> I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
> This version of the kernel patch is relative to 2.6.18. This longer
> than usual delay between releases comes from the large amount of changes
> than went into this new release following the feedback I got on LKML. As
> a result, the code has improved.

Thanks for doing that.

Would it be possible to get an accounting of the disposition of the various
review comments?  Of the "yes I did that" or "OK, but I'll do it later" or
"no, you're an idiot" form?